|

|
 |
IF ONLY DEC HAD A LITTLE CHRISTMAS SPIRIT
Nate Dickinson |
|
An
article entitled "Deer take bite out of Yuletide tree crop"
graced the front page of the December 7th issue of the Albany,
New York Times Union . It stated that Rudolph's cousins are
putting the Scrooge to Christmas tree farmers across the Capital
Region. Tree growers are saying that hungry and overflowing
herds are a scourge worse than the extreme weather that led to
other disappointing harvests this year.
Apparently some farmers even had to forgo planting trees like
Fraser fir, a Yuletide favorite, in favor of species with
less-palatable needles. The point has been reached where the
Greene County agricultural agent is telling growers to think
about planting spruce.
Blame is placed on a series of mild winters for the record high
deer populations. This is the line routinely offered by those
responsible for the efficient management of the wildlife
resources, namely DEC (New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation). It sure gets old, and it is utter
nonsense. A healthy, a well-managed deer herd can with stand the
rigors of severe winters. Mild winters do not come into play,
when populations are held in balance with range carrying
capacity. The facts of the matter are that deer numbers are not
controlled, due to an anemic program that does not provide for
the harvest of sufficient numbers of antlerless deer during the
hunting season. This results in hungry deer populations well
above the carrying capacity with, to make matters worse, a
progressive loss of their innate fear of humans. And, the
Department is quoted as saying that after an early freeze or
snow, nutrition ceases to be available elsewhere in nature. This
is a fairy tale. White-tailed de er adjust nicely with a
transition from a herbaceous to a woody natural plant diet.
DEC must accept the blame, since according to the mandates of
the Environmental Conservation Law they are the responsible
agency. The Law states that it shall be the policy to foster,
create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can
thrive in harmony; a very clear mission. The DEC is directed to
develop and carry out programs that will maintain desirable
species in ecological balance, regard is directed toward
ecological balance, and the compatibility of production and
harvesting wildlife crops with other necessary or desirable land
uses. Indeed, this is a very straight forward and does not
suggest that mild winters should be used as an excuse. Another
section of the Law calls specifically for maintaining deer
numbers in balance with natural food supplies; not Christmas
trees or other agricultural crops.
Maybe DEC has become too busy catering to the grandiose schemes
of the many radical environmental groups, harassing and
penalizing private property owners with a myriad of intrusive
regulations, social-engineering the already depressed
Adirondacks and other regions, and hugging wetlands and
caressing butterflies. There apparently is just not enough
luxury to devote sufficient time and brain power to the sound
management of one of the State's most valuable wildlife species.
And, since Earth Day there has been a tremendous change of
emphasis in favor of non-game species.
Further contributing to the neglect of the problem and
implementation of necessary corrective measures is the tendency
to cater to those individuals and groups who believe that wild
animals should be given rights. They would like people to feel
guilty when human concerns and interests, such as growing
Christmas trees, take precedence over those of wildlife.
Actually, in light of the way wildlife treats humans, man is
very nice and tolerant of the wild creatures. A case can easily
be made that wildlife already has too many rights, some of which
man does not possess. Wildlife is allowed to roam at will, not
having to show respect for private property and is not required
to adhere to any sanitary codes. And, as is the case with the
white-tailed deer, to wantonly destroy forest vegetation,
landscape plants, and agricultural crops; yes, including
Christmas trees.
Beginning in the 1930's, New York State was recognized as being
a leader in white-tailed deer management and possessing one of
the most sophisticated, effective programs in the nation.
Refinements were continually implemented and discipline
emphasized to insure that the program was totally in line with
the mandates of the Law. Then around 1990 the worm turned. A
once noble program lost much of its luster. In the process, the
Big Game Unit Leader was replaced and much of the necessary
discipline was scrapped. The reasons behind such drastic changes
have never been satisfactorily explained, but it would appear
that there was a desire to conform to the dictates of the
environmental movement, which was exerting extreme pressure on
DEC to redirect program emphasis and to a lesser extent, a
once-ineffective, noisy minority of hunters who cried that too
many female deer where being harvested.
It is interesting to note that shortly before these drastic
changes one random survey of deer hunters revealed that three
out of four respondents rated New York's deer management program
good or excellent, while in another survey only 15 percent
expressed any dissatisfaction. Two non-random surveys conducted
by members of the State Legislature produced comparable results.
Obviously the will of the vast majority was ignored.
After being relieved of his responsibilities the ex-Big Game
Unit Leader erected a granite headstone, replete with the
epitaph " RIP N.Y. DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1935-1990" in his
backyard. As time goes by it becomes more and more evident that
the once noble program does in fact lie beneath the stone.
The Times Union article ends with a rather interesting quote
from one of the tree farmers, "I guess I am sort of live and let
live with the deer, so long as they don't damage anything". So
be it.
December 10, 2002 Nate Dickinson
|
Printer Friendly Version
More from Nate:
3/03 -
THE ABOMINABLE NEW JERSEY BEAR WAR
3/03 - ARE THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY SCAMS
CREEPING INTO CLASSROOMS?
2/03 -
A Call To Truth and Honesty in Environmental Deliberations
1/03 - LET IT BE KNOWN THAT THE U.S.A. IS
GETTING WILDER,
AND MORE SO EVERY DAY
12/02 -
SOME THOUGHTS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL
MENTALITY
4/02 - INTRIGUE OF EVERGLADES
TAINTED
11/02 - MAINE IS NOT ALONE IN EXPERIENCING RURAL CLEANSING |